Turkish cinematograph role in terms of nation building
47 43
Keywords:
nation building, cultural policy, cinematograph, identity.Abstract
Turkish cinematograph role in terms of nation building, his development path, as well as modern cultural policy in this field is investigated in this article. Turkish cinematograph as the most modern, mobile and mass type of art reflects the processes going down in the society, as well as takes part an active participation in formation of moral values, behavioral stereotypes, cultural and national identities of country citizens. National identity is expressed not only in the films of historical plan, but also in the films of modernity and future, such as ethno-cultural traditions of the people are shown in them. The author unfolds the concept “deep nation” and considers the effect of Kemalist ideology to the culture and cinematograph.
References
1. Официальный сайт Министерства культуры и туризма Турецкой Республики // www. turizm.gov. tr.
2. Колосов В., Мироненко Н. Геополитика и политическая география. - М.: Аспект Пресс, 2002. - 479 с.
3. Robins, Kevin and Asu Aksoy. “Deep Nation: The National Question and Turkish Cinema Culture” / Cinema and Nation. - London and New York: Routledge, 2000.- Р. 210.
4. Mango, Andrew. Ataturk. The Cambridge History of Turkey.V.4.The Modern World. - Cambridge, 2008.- P.159.
5. Süreyya Şevket. Enver Paşa, c 2, İst. -1971 // Tuncer Hüseyin “Türk Yurdu” üzerine bir inceleme. –Ank.: Kültür bakanlığı yayınları, 1990, s. 18.
6. Suner, Asuman. New Turkish Cinema: Belonging, Identity and Memory. London: I.B. Tauris, 2009. P.16.
7. Nezih Erdogan. Narratives of resistance. Screen 39:3 Autumn. 1998. p. 266. Kostepen, Enis. Beyond the gret divide of art-haus versus popular?: Emergent forms of filmmfking in Turkey/Young Turkish Cinema.- Istambul, 2009.-P.9.
8. İzzet Mehmed. Milliyet nazariyeleri ve milli hayat. –İst.: Ötüken yayınları, 1981.- 245 s.
2. Колосов В., Мироненко Н. Геополитика и политическая география. - М.: Аспект Пресс, 2002. - 479 с.
3. Robins, Kevin and Asu Aksoy. “Deep Nation: The National Question and Turkish Cinema Culture” / Cinema and Nation. - London and New York: Routledge, 2000.- Р. 210.
4. Mango, Andrew. Ataturk. The Cambridge History of Turkey.V.4.The Modern World. - Cambridge, 2008.- P.159.
5. Süreyya Şevket. Enver Paşa, c 2, İst. -1971 // Tuncer Hüseyin “Türk Yurdu” üzerine bir inceleme. –Ank.: Kültür bakanlığı yayınları, 1990, s. 18.
6. Suner, Asuman. New Turkish Cinema: Belonging, Identity and Memory. London: I.B. Tauris, 2009. P.16.
7. Nezih Erdogan. Narratives of resistance. Screen 39:3 Autumn. 1998. p. 266. Kostepen, Enis. Beyond the gret divide of art-haus versus popular?: Emergent forms of filmmfking in Turkey/Young Turkish Cinema.- Istambul, 2009.-P.9.
8. İzzet Mehmed. Milliyet nazariyeleri ve milli hayat. –İst.: Ötüken yayınları, 1981.- 245 s.
Downloads
How to Cite
Kagazbaeva Э. М. (2016). Turkish cinematograph role in terms of nation building. Journal of Oriental Studies, 74(4). Retrieved from https://bulletin-orientalism.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-vostok/article/view/737
Issue
Section
HISTORY
